“Other than the fact that they wanted a change to be made, I still don’t understand,’’ said Skinner in a phone interview.
“That’s part of the business. But I look at my résumé and the success I had at BC, and I look at the résumé of some coaches who are in the tournament now, and I look at my résumé and I think it compares favorably.
“I ran a good program, I graduated my kids. Everybody has problems, but we addressed them and handled them in a matter that satisfied every one.
“At the end of the day, this is a results-oriented business. I recognize that. But I put the program in a good place. I raised the program to the level where we were always in the hunt.’’
Skinner went 247-165 in 13 years at BC, taking the Eagles to seven NCAA Tournament appearances (in a stretch of nine years). His tenure ended last March, following a 15-16 season, in what the school described as a mutual decision but was largely perceived as a dismissal. Skinner had three years left on his contract.
The year is up, and he is looking now for a job. So he comes in the papers to state his case after his contract expired. Al's a good coach and an even better guy, it all depends if he wants to work at it. He wasn't getting it done the last few years at BC, so he rightfully got fired. He can be credited for keeping the program respectable and making them a power NCAA team again, as well as transitioning them to the ACC. Al's team's did play with what he called an "edge," and that's what made them great. They played with that swagger that you need now of days to compete at a high level, and beat anyone anytime. Al, like I said, is a good man, and will end up with a good program and legacy.